In what way is the Rutherford’s atomic model different from that of
Thomson’s atomic model?
Rutherford’s atomic model differs from Thomson’s primarily in the arrangement of positive and negative charges within an atom. Thomson’s model, often called the “plum pudding” model, proposed a positively charged sphere with negatively charged electrons embedded within it. Rutherford’s model, on the other hand, introduced the concept of a small, dense, positively charged nucleus at the center of the atom, with electrons orbiting around it.
Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
Thomson’s Model:
Atom is a uniformly positively charged sphere.
Negatively charged electrons are embedded within this sphere, like plums in pudding.
Electrically neutral, as the positive and negative charges are equal in magnitude.
Rutherford’s Model:
Atom has a small, positively charged nucleus at its center.
Negatively charged electrons orbit this nucleus.
Most of the atom’s mass is concentrated in the nucleus.
The atom is mostly empty space.